In my previous post related to mutual funds, I have given
details about Mutual funds options like Growth, Dividend and Dividend
Re-investment. Just to summarize those details here:
Growth funds keep
investing the profits made on investment, so if your investment makes 10 Rs
Profit on 100 Rs in certain time, that 10 Rs will be invested in same fund so
here your unit NAV value increases and not the count of units.
Dividend Funds share
partial profit with investors and invest remaining profit, so if your
investment makes 10 Rs Profit on 100 Rs in certain time, that 3-5 Rs will
returned to as dividend and remaining will be invested in same fund.
If we see Growth option,
expert say it gives compounding return because your profits are getting
Re-invested. Note that it is not compounding interest that banks give, it is
compounding return which might be uncertain. If we think bit pessimistically,
what if there is a crisis in market or mid-term negativity at a time when you
are already sitting on ‘supposed to be good’ profit? The profits accrued in
that amount of time might get wiped out or get reduced. Assume if you keep
making 10% annual return for 3 years on your investment that you did at start
of 1st year, as per rule of compounding return, fund will be at 33% return at
end of 3rd year. Now what if market goes down due to some issue and
fund gives 15% negative return for 4th year? In this case after 4 years return
will be around 13% as profit.
If we take Dividend
option of same fund with exactly same scenario viz. what if there is a
crisis in market or mid-term negativity at a time when you are already sitting
on ‘supposed to be good’ profit? The profits accrued in that amount of time might
get wiped out but you must have already
got good part of that profit in form of Dividend in previous 3 years. Say
on 100 Rs investment, fund gave 10% return in 1st year and you got 50%
of profit as dividend, so on 10 Rs Profit you would get 5 Rs as dividend and 5
Rs will be Re-Invested. If this process is continued for 3 years, after end of
3rd year, you would have got around
16% as dividend back and 15% profit in portfolio. Now what if market goes
down due to some issue and fund gives 15% negative CAGR for 4th year? after 4
years you will still have had 16% profit in pocket as dividends (as there will
normally be no dividend in 4th year because of negative return) and
your existing portfolio would have had 1% loss,so over and all 15% as profit.
So to summarize the case above, in exactly same scenario,
Growth option will give 13% profit while Dividend option will give 15% profit,
most importantly with less risk in long term.
Now things that I have mentioned might sound hypothetical
but that’s how market runs. I think it is better to have Growth option when you
have no worry about uncertainty of market, can wait for really really long time
and have less worry of money you are putting in, but if you have little bit
worry about uncertainty, go for Dividend option. With Dividend you will not
only get money back on regular intervals, your risk will always be in balance. Remember
that if you want great corpus after 15-20 years then always go for Growth
option as you won’t be taking out any money from fund until 15-20 years in any
case.
Pessimist way:
If fund is giving consistently negative returns, Dividend
and Growth option both will give same negative return.
Optimist way:
If fund is giving consistently positive returns with very
rare negative return in any year, Growth option will give better return
than Dividend option.
Balanced way:
If fund is giving fluctuating returns with few years of positive
return followed by negative return in any year, Dividend option will give
better value than Growth option.
Keep in mind that all afore mentioned scenarios are for
Equity Mutual funds as for Equity mutual funds there is no long term capital
gain tax, no tax on Dividend received and also no Dividend Distribution tax (
unlike for Shares). Relevance of these options change for Debt Mutual funds as
for those funds even dividends gets taxed.